Wednesday, March 30, 2022

Do not time the market

"Timing the market is a fool's game, whereas time in the market is your greatest natural advantage." 

- Nick Murray


I am a firm believer in the concept of buy and hold investing. I invest regularly every single month, in a group of attractively valued companies. I do not accumulate cash, waiting for a crash, nor do I get in and out of stocks based on moving averages or even valuation targets. Once I buy a company, I hold it, and reinvest dividends, for as long as it doesn't cut or eliminate the dividend. I simply follow my own strategy, through thick or thin.

Many investors seem to believe that they can score extra points by timing the market. In my opinion, they are needlessly complicating investing. 

In order to be successful with market timing, you need to make two correct decisions:


1. When to get out 

2. When to get back in


I believe that this is impossible to do. Hence, it's best to just buy and hold.

I've interacted with countless investors who missed most of the bull market of the past 14 - 15 years.


The story usually goes like this:

They sold after a decline in the stock market, and then stayed in cash for years.

The first question I always get is: "Do you think the market is too high"


It is a shame to get out of stocks because "they are too high". Or because you are afraid of stock market fluctuations. 

It's always sad to see this happen. I once spoke to a gentleman who sold in 2009, and never got back in. They locked in losses, and missed out on a lot of appreciation and dividends.

Of course, if you witnessed 2000-2010, you were trained that once S&P 500 reaches 1,500 points, we are due for a 50% decline. However, the issue is that over the long-run, US stocks tend to rise due to growth in earnings, revenues, dividends. Even if stocks stay flat, investors would generate returns through dividends and their reinvestment.

A good cure for market timing is to create your own investment system. It can help reduce guesswork, and keep you invested.

In my case, I invest every month in several quality companies with long streaks of annual dividend increases. I then stay invested for as long as these companies do not cut dividends. I reinvest those dividends, and hold these shares. It is best to avoid trading in and out of positions, and selling for some "reason", which usually happens to be fear, or exaggerating on a recent event. Other reasons could include greed, by selling a perfectly good companies because the valuation went a little too high, and reinvesting into a higher yielding stock that is a higher risk stock. I am very diversified, which helps me sleep well at night.

In other cases, folks tend to buy ETFs, which may cost a little in fees, but automates the investing process. The behavioral aspect is always the hard part with ETFs, because there are so many of them, which makes a lot of perfectionists out there tinker with their portfolios, until they try to find the perfect ETF ( Note: It doesn't exist)

In general, investors make money by buying equities, and holding on to them. While share prices are volatile in the short-run and can result in unrealized losses in a given day, week, month or even year, it is unlikely that over the course of a decade or two there will be losses. This of course works for diversified portfolios of course.


Stocks go up in the long run, because they are ownership pieces of real businesses. Over time, these businesses earn more money, and reinvest a portion to grow the business. They end up generating more than they know what to do with, on aggregate, and send those excess profits to shareholders. All of this tends to grow the values of those businesses as well. It is a true virtuous cycle, which lets the long-term investor take full advantage of the power of compounding. 

This is my favorite chart. In the long-run, US stocks have built a lot of wealth for patient long-term investors. It was never easy, and not always a straight line up. However, patience for US investors has been historically well rewarded. Market timing on the other hand has not been well rewarded.


Source: Stocks for the Long Run

Another favorite statistic I have has to do with staying fully invested, versus missing the best days. If you try to time the short-term movement of security prices, you risk the chance of missing out on the best days. This reduces your future returns significantly.

Source: Putnam

The best and worst days are usually clustered together. If you jump in and out of stocks due to fear and greed that short-term fluctuations cause for you, you risk the chance of missing out on returns, compounding losses, and paying taxes, commissions and fees on top of that. You do not want to be compounding losses.

There’s no need to time the market when you have such a high chance of success through a long-term buy and hold. 


I also wanted to share this amazing video of Peter Lynch, on how to handle stock market volatility.


"Some event will come out of left field, and the market will go down, or the market will go up. Volatility will occur. Markets will continue to have these ups and downs. … Basic corporate profits have grown about 8% a year historically. So, corporate profits double about every nine years. The stock market ought to double about every nine years. So I think — the market is about 3,800 today, or 3,700 — I'm pretty convinced the next 3,800 points will be up; it won't be down. The next 500 points, the next 600 points — I don’t know which way they’ll go. So, the market ought to double in the next eight or nine years. They’ll double again in eight or nine years after that. Because profits go up 8% a year, and stocks will follow. That's all there is to it."


As my friend Chris D’Agnes says, "Don’t just do something, stand there."

This Buffett quote sums up my approach to just sitting there:


"Lethargy bordering on sloth remains the cornerstone of our investment style"

Thank you for reading!

Relevant Articles:




Monday, March 28, 2022

Warren Buffett's Investment in GEICO

Warren Buffett needs no introduction. If you have read "The Snowball", you would know that he was entrepreneurial and focused on investments and making money from an early age.

Back when he was 20, he set a goal to work for Ben Graham. He learned everything there is about him, and his investment style. He had noticed that Ben Graham sat on the board of GEICO, and had a significant ownership of the company.

This is why Buffett ended up taking a train to GEICO's headquarters on a weekend, in order to learn more about the company and its operations. He was only 21 years old at the time. He ended up knocking on the door, until the Janitor let him in and introduced him to the company's CEO. The CEO managed to explain the whole business model, the competitive advantages of the business. This conversation planted the seeds behind Buffett's future endeavors in Insurance, which ultimately led to his investment in Berkshire Hathaway, and transforming it to what it is today.

After the conversation, and reviewing filings and reports, Warren Buffett wrote this analysis of GEICO at the young age of 21. This is very impressive, given his young age. You can read it as PDF from here: The Security I Like Best


Source: The Security I Like Best


This is a good lesson in learning. When you write something down, this forces you to think hard about the topic at heart. By trying to distill your thoughts and teach others, you end up improving your communication skills and create a piece of research that is well supported with facts and strong arguments. This strengthens the research, because your thinking is clearer.

He invested $10,000 in the stock, and made a 50% profit in a single year. He did sell the stock however, and reinvested the proceeds elsewhere. That stock became a 130 bagger over the next 20 years. It would have turned that $10,000 into $1.30 million.

If Buffett had not sold the stock, it would have compounded to over $1.30million by 1972.

He was ultimately involved with saving GEICO in the 1970s, when the company had troubles. This investment led him to owning a big chunk of the car insurer. Berkshire invested $45.7 million in GEICO in 1976, and owned about a third of the stock.

The company ultimately rebounded its business, and returned to profitability. GEICO was a dividend achiever, which regularly raised dividends and repurchased shares. As a result of these share repurchases, Buffett's stake in the business increased at the expense of the remaining shareholders. He ultimately had a 50% ownership by 1995, which is when he decided to acquire the rest of GEICO.

Notice that GEICO was a member of the Dividend Achievers List, with a 16 year track record of annual dividend increases as of 1994. Berkshire was about to acquire it by 1995.



A few other Berkshire Hathaway acquisitions that were dividend achievers include General Re, Flight Safety & Wesco.

I find this article particularly fascinating, because it shows a few lessons. Notably, the importance of writing down your thesis, in order to improve investment methodology over time. This also helps in order to make sure you have done the work, in order to reach to a logical conclusion, and not wait for stock tips from others. Of course, it is fascinating to read something that a 21 year old Buffett has written up. It was obvious, in hindsight, that he had bright future ahead of him.

Relevant Articles:

Sunday, March 20, 2022

Five Dividend Stocks Rewarding Shareholders With Raises

I review the list of dividend increases weekly, as part of my portfolio monitoring process. I usually narrow the list down to companies with at least a ten year history of annual dividend increases.

The next involves reviewing each company in sufficient detail, in order to determine if dividend increases are based on solid fundamentals. This review includes looking at trends in earnings per share, dividends per share, payout ratios as good start. The goal is to determine the likelihood of future dividend increases.

The last review point includes valuation. In general, I try to avoid overpaying for companies. To me it used to mean not paying more than 20 times earnings for a stock. Valuation is more art than science however ( as is investing in general). This is why it is important to look at relative valuations and growth in the opportunity set, not just focus on absolute numbers.

These steps keep me in fighting shape, and help me monitor as many companies in the investable dividend growth universe in advance. This helps me to be prepared when the right opportunity at the right price comes along.

Over the past week, there were three companies which raised dividends to shareholders. Each company has a minimum ten year streak of annual dividend increases under its belt. The companies include:



This of course is just a list, not a recommendation.

When I review companies, I look at ten year trends in:

1) Earnings per share
2) Dividend payout ratio
3) Dividends per share
4) Valuation


Since I have some experience evaluating dividend companies, I also modify my criteria based on the environment we are in and the availability of quality companies. If I see a company with a strong business model and certain characteristics that I like, I may require a dividend streak that is lower than a decade. I have also found success in looking beyond screening criteria by purchasing stocks a little above the borders contained in a screen.

It is important to be flexible, without being too lenient.

You may like this analysis of Realty Income (O) as an example of how I review companies.

Relevant Articles:



Monday, March 14, 2022

Dividends Provide a Tax-Efficient Form of Income

A famous saying goes that there are two things certain in this world: death and taxes. While I am pretty sure I can’t escape death, I know that I can try to legally minimize taxes as much as possible. I hate paying more taxes than I have to. In a previous series of articles I discussed how I am maxing out tax-deferred accounts today, in order to minimize my tax liabilities as much as possible. In addition, I am trying to get a deduction today, and then roll these amounts into Roth and try to pay as close to zero percent on the conversion as possible. The amounts in tax-deferred accounts will be the tip of the iceberg, or the “safety net” in case my main strategy experiences turbulence. In effect, these tax-deferred accounts are equivalent to an emergency fund for my retirement.

However, I think I didn't stress enough the fact that most of my income in retirement would be coming from qualified dividends. This will be my bread and butter, because dividends provide the best tax-efficient method of income in the US.

Did you know that if you were single, and your taxable income does not exceed $40,400 in 2021, you would owe zero dollars in Federal taxes on your qualified dividend income? If you were married, filing jointly, you won’t owe a dime in taxes on qualified dividends at the Federal level as long as your taxable income does not exceed $80,800 in 2021.

This means that if you are single, living on your own, and only claiming yourself as a dependent, you can essentially make $52,950 in annual qualified dividend income, and pay zero taxes on that. This includes the Standard Deduction of $12,550. This calculation also assumes you have no other sources of income and no other deductions for the sake of simplicity and to illustrate the point. In order for you to generate so much in income, your portfolio would likely be worth around $1.765 million at a dividend yields of 3%. If you made your selections wisely, your dividend income should at least keep up with inflation over time. With most dividend growth stocks, I expect a 5% - 6% annual dividend increase in the long run, ahead of the long-term annual inflation rate of 3%.

This net dividend income for the single individual above is equivalent to $65,298 in salary earnings. In other words, if you are single, it would take you to earn $65,298 from a day job in order to end up with the same amount of net income that the same individual can achieve with “only” $52,950 in qualified dividend income. And you were wondering why Warren Buffett’s secretary is so vocal about her bosses taxes.

Let’s see how this translates for a married couple, filing jointly, without any kids, mortgages and student loans. They could essentially earn $105,900 in annual qualified dividend income, before owing a single cent to the Federal government in 2021. This includes the standard deductions of $25,100 added to the $80,800 maximum threshold for married couples. In order for this couple to generate so much in income, their dividend growth portfolio would likely be worth around $3.523 million at yields of 3%.

This net dividend income for the married individuals above is equivalent to $130,597 in salary earnings. In other words, if you are married with no children, it would take the couple to earn $130,597 from a day job in order to end up with the same amount of net income they can achieve with “only” $105,900 in qualified dividend income.



For the sake of simplicity, and to illustrate a point about the tax efficiency of dividends, I have compared salary only income versus dividend only income. The tax code is so complicated, that it would probably take me years and hundreds of pages before I can explain every single possible scenario affecting those sample single and married individuals.

I claim that the dividend income is the most efficient form of income in the US, because it can increase over time to compensate for inflation. With municipal bonds, you do not pay any income tax, no matter how much you make. However, since your income is fixed, your “real” purchasing power is decreasing over time. As a result, you are worse off than with dividend stocks over extended periods of time.

Some readers may be more fortunate than others, and wonder about the taxation of qualified dividends and long-term capital gains above $105,900/year for a married couple filing jointly.

I found the following table, which shows the income levels for various brackets, and how much taxes will be owed on that income.



This means that for a single filer, qualified dividend income up to $458,400 ($445,850 plus 12,550 standard deduction) will be taxed at only 15%. For the married filing jointly couple, qualified dividend income up to $526,700 ($501,600 plus $25,100 standard deduction) will be taxed at only 15%.

If the modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 ($250,000 if married filing jointly), the 3.8% net investment income tax still applies.

You can view the updated table for 2022 here:

The standard deduction for single payers rose to $12,950, while the standard deduction for married, filing jointly rose to $25,900.

This means that a married couple that is earning up to $109,250 in annual dividend income would pay zero in Federal Income taxes. That's a pretty sweet deal in my opinion.


Long-term capital gains are taxed the same way as qualified dividends. In order to have your gain classified as long-term capital gain, you should have held the asset that you sold for a profit for at least one calendar year. If you held for less than one year, your income will be treated as an ordinary gain, subject to your marginal tax rate.

I should also mention that ordinary dividend income is taxed like ordinary income. Luckily, this type of dividends are not taxed at the FICA level. One example of ordinary dividend income includes the income sent your way by Real Estate Investment trusts, net of any depreciation for example. Each REIT has a different tax picture, which also varies every year. I didn’t include these into my scenario above, because I didn’t want to overly complicate something that was already complicated. But feel free to play it out safely at home. If you do not believe me, you can check the website of National Retail Properties (NNN) at this link.

Under the new tax law, REIT investors to deduct 20% of the income, with the remainder of the income taxed at the filer’s marginal rate. It is available even if the taxpayer doesn’t itemize deductions.

Shareholders of REITs who now pay the top income-tax rate of 37% on dividends received would see that rate drop to 29.6%, according to NAREIT, formerly the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts.

I purposefully also avoided included MLP distributions, because these are even hairier at tax time. These distributions might not even be taxable to you as long as your cost basis is above zero.

Foreign dividends are another type of income which is taxed usually as qualified dividends. The twist is that some governments withhold the tax at the source, which entitles you to a credit. Therefore, if you paid $15 in dividend taxes to Canada on your $100 dividend check from Canadian National Railway (CNI), you don’t also have to pay Uncle Sam $15 additional dollars in dividend income. You can essentially get a credit for this. If you are single earning under $46,250 in dividend income, you might even get a check in the mail for $15.


Full Disclosure: I am not a tax advisor, and this article should not be considered as individual tax advice. Please discuss your individual tax situation with a licensed CPA. I have no position in the companies listed above.

Relevant Articles:

Best International Dividend Stocks
My Retirement Strategy for Tax-Free Income
How to Retire Early With Tax-Advantaged Accounts
Six Dividend Paying Stocks I Purchased for my IRA
Should income investors worry about higher dividend taxes?

Saturday, March 12, 2022

Six Dividend Stocks Rewarding Patient Shareholders With A Raise

 As a dividend growth investor, I look for solid companies to invest my hard earned money in. I look for companies that can grow earnings, and afford to raise dividends regularly. A long dividend streak is the indicator of quality, that places companies on my list for further research. A long dividend streak is not an accident, but the result of a long period of a solid company generating excess cashflows. A byproduct of this solid competitive advantage ultimately results in companies showering their investors with more cash dividends every single year. In my research I look at trends in earnings per share, dividends per share, dividend payout ratios and valuation. I try to evaluate qualitative as well as quantitative factors at play as well.


This is why I review the list of dividend increases every single week. This is a helpful monitoring tool for the companies I own, and for the companies I am interested in owning.

In the past week, there were several companies that raised dividends to shareholders. These companies have at least a ten year streak of annual dividend increases. The companies include:

Company

Ticker

New Dividend

Old Dividend 

Increase

Years Dividend Increases

P/E

Dividend Yield 

10 year Annualized Dividend Growth

Calvin B. Taylor Bankshares, Inc.

TYCB

0.30

0.29

3.45%

33

10.90

3.21%

2.35%

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CL

0.47

0.45

4.44%

60

22.22

2.55%

4.66%

Globe Life Inc.

GL

0.2075

0.1975

5.06%

17

11.81

0.86%

10.19%

Horace Mann Educators Corporation

HMN

0.32

0.31

3.23%

13

11.38

3.13%

10.42%

QUALCOMM Incorporated

QCOM

0.75

0.68

10.29%

20

12.87

1.97%

12.54%

W. P. Carey Inc.

WPC

1.057

1.055

0.19%

26

16.08

5.30%

7.01%


This of course is just a list, not a recommendation.

I also wanted to mention Lindt & Sprüngli, which raised its annual dividend by 9.09% to 1,200 Swiss Francs/share. This is the 27th year in a row that the company has increased the annual dividend. It is traded on the Swiss stock market, although the stock is also traded as an ADR on the OTC market in the US. The stock is expensive based on absolute share price and based on valuation however. 

When I review companies, I look at ten year trends in:

1) Earnings per share
2) Dividend payout ratio
3) Dividends per share
4) Valuation


Since I have some experience evaluating dividend companies, I also modify my criteria based on the environment we are in and the availability of quality companies. If I see a company with a strong business model and certain characteristics that I like, I may require a dividend streak that is lower than a decade. I have also found success in looking beyond screening criteria by purchasing stocks a little above the borders contained in a screen.

It is important to be flexible, without being too lenient.

You may like this analysis of General Dynamics (GD) as an example of how I review companies.

Relevant Articles:

Saturday, March 5, 2022

Eleven Dividend Growth Stocks Raising Dividends for Shareholders

I collect various data points throughout the day, month, year. My job as an investor is to try and connect them in a way to profit.

As part of my monitoring process, I review the list of dividend increases every week. This helps me monitor existing positions. This is helpful in my decision to add to positions, hold them or sell them. 

Looking at the list of dividend increases also helps me monitor the list of dividend growth stocks for further developments.  This helps me identify companies for further research.

I usually focus on the companies that have managed to increase dividends for at least a decade. I do this because I want to focus on companies that have managed to grow dividends over the range of a typical boom-bust economic cycle. 

There were ten companies that raised dividends last week, and also have a ten year track record of annual dividend increases. Check the list below - however, this is just a starting list for further research:

Company

Ticker

New Dividend

Old Dividend

Increase

Years Dividend Increases

P/E

Dividend Yield

10 year Annualized Dividend Growth

Federal Agricultural Mortgage

AGM

 $    0.95

 $    0.85

11.76%

11

10.87

3.22%

33.21%

Best Buy

BBY

 $    0.88

 $    0.70

25.71%

19

11.59

3.32%

15.82%

Canadian Natural Resources

CNQ

 $    0.75

 $    0.59

27.12%

22

11.18

4.14%

16.16%

Digital Realty Trust

DLR

 $    1.22

 $    1.16

5.17%

17

20.3

3.50%

5.39%

General Dynamics

GD

 $    1.26

 $    1.19

5.88%

31

20.34

2.05%

9.82%

Linde

LIN

 $    1.17

 $    1.06

10.38%

30

24.25

1.66%

7.80%

QNB

QNBC

 $    0.36

 $    0.35

2.86%

12

8.06

3.85%

3.42%

Standard & Poor's Global

SPGI

 $    0.85

 $    0.77

10.39%

49

30.37

0.83%

11.90%

SpartanNash

SPTN

 $    0.21

 $    0.20

5.00%

12

15.49

2.55%

12.56%

Steel Dynamics

STLD

 $    0.34

 $    0.26

30.77%

13

5.22

1.76%

10.63%

Texas Pacific Land

TPL

 $    3.00

 $    2.75

9.09%

18

23.01

0.92%

48.57%


This of course is just a list, not a recommendation.

When I review companies, I look at ten year trends in:

1) Earnings per share
2) Dividend payout ratio
3) Dividends per share
4) Valuation


Since I have some experience evaluating dividend companies, I also modify my criteria based on the environment we are in and the availability of quality companies. If I see a company with a strong business model and certain characteristics that I like, I may require a dividend streak that is lower than a decade. I have also found success in looking beyond screening criteria by purchasing stocks a little above the borders contained in a screen.

It is important to be flexible, without being too lenient.

You may like this analysis of General Dynamics (GD) as an example of how I review companies.

Relevant Articles:

Popular Posts