The company’s last dividend increase was in June 2012 when the Board of Directors approved a 20% increase to 36 cents/share. The company’s largest competitors include Wal-Mart Stores (WMT), Dollar Tree (DLTR) and Costco (COST).
Over the past decade this dividend growth stock has delivered an annualized total return of 6% to its shareholders.
The company has managed to an impressive increase in annual EPS growth since 2002. Earnings per share have risen by 10% per year. Analysts expect Target to earn $4.35 per share in 2013 and $4.86 per share in 2014. In comparison Target earned $4.28/share in 2012.
The company has managed to an impressive increase in annual EPS growth since 2002. Earnings per share have risen by 10% per year. Analysts expect Target to earn $4.35 per share in 2013 and $4.86 per share in 2014. In comparison Target earned $4.28/share in 2012.
Future growth would likely be focused on expanding same-store sales and renovating existing stores, rather than simply by opening a large number of locations. Future growth could be realized by the increased penetration of the RED Card, which the company’s cashiers keep promoting to customers. Another venue for growth that could increase the number of customer visits is the remodeling of its stores, which would add fresh foods to the stores. The company is targeting middle-class and upper income consumers, which are more interested in quality and diversity of product offerings, rather than simply looking at the lowest prices. It has in essence managed to differentiate itself from Wal-Mart (WMT), while also retaining its status as a discounter.
The company also is on track to bring the number of stores in Canada do 130 by 2013, which could lead to long-term profits. Currently, the costs associated with jumpstarting its Canada operations have been dilutive for earnings, and would be for the next few years.
Target Stores has a goal of earning $8/share by 2018, which would be driven by 5% sales growth in US, share repurchases, store openings in Canada, as well as square footage growth. Risks to growth include worsening of the economy, failure to execute its strategy of effectively differentiating itself from arch rival Wal-Mart as well as credit card risks.
The return on equity has remained consistently in a tight range between 15% and 19%. Rather than focus on absolute values for this indicator, I generally want to see at least a stable return on equity over time.
The annual dividend payment has increased by 17.50% per year over the past decade, which is higher than to the growth in EPS.
A 17.50% growth in distributions translates into the dividend payment doubling every four years. If we look at historical data, going as far back as 1988 we see that Target has actually managed to double its dividend every six years on average.
The dividend payout ratio has increased from 13.30% in 2003 to 25.70% in 2012. The expansion in the payout ratio has enabled dividend growth to be faster than EPS growth over the past decade. A lower payout is always a plus, since it leaves room for consistent dividend growth minimizing the impact of short-term fluctuations in earnings.
Currently, Target Stores is attractively valued at 14.90 times earnings and has an adequately covered dividend but only yields 2.30%. In comparison, rival Wal-Mart (WMT) trades at 15.80 times earnings and only yields 2.10%. Target could be a decent addition to a portfolio on dips below $57; however Wal-Mart (WMT) continues to be my preferred way to play big box retailers.
Full Disclosure: Long WMT
Relevant Articles:
- Five Consistent Dividend Payers Boosting Distributions
- Does entry price matter to dividend investors?
- Active Dividend Growth Investing
- Dividend Growth Stocks by Sector - Retail
Thank you for your review. I was curious how you came up with your entry price of less than $57. As I understand it, Target meets your criteria for starting or adding to a position.
ReplyDelete