With speculation that the government will either nationalize Bank of America and Citigroup or increase its stake in the banks, financial stocks have been hit pretty hard as of lately. With both banks trading in the single digits, investor confidence in their survival is pretty low.
Two other notable companies whose future appears uncertain are General Electric and General Motors. The common thing between the two is that they are both also members of Dow Industrials and S&P 500 and both are trading in the single digits.
Before we understand why does it matter that the four companies mentioned above trade in the single digits, it would be beneficial to understand how Dow Jones Industrials average is calculated.
The Dow Jones Industrial index is price-weighted. This gives relatively higher-priced stocks more influence over the average than their lower-priced counterparts, but takes no account of the relative size or market capitalisation of the components. To compensate for the effects of stock splits and other adjustments, it is currently a scaled average, not the actual average of the prices of its component stocks—the sum of the component prices is divided by a divisor, which changes whenever one of the component stocks has a stock split or stock dividend, to generate the value of the index.
Thus at the current market price of GE, GM, BAC and C, these stocks account for 1.82% of the Dow Jones Index. Thus, if these stocks all went to zero, anyone who owns a Dow Jones Industrials linked ETF or mutual fund won’t care that much. Even if the whole financial system went bankrupt, and all the financial components of Dow Jones Industrials went to zero, the index would lose 4.17% of its value.
In comparison to S&P 500, which is a market cap weighted index, if Bank of America, Citigroup, General Electric and General Motors all went to zero, the effect would not be much different. These stocks account for 2.01% of the weight in the broader US stock market index.
Relevant Articles:
- Dow 370,000
- The future for US Auto Stocks
- Is GE’s dividend safe?
- Dividend Investing Resources
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Back in the early 1970s, there was a group of companies which are referred to as “The Nifty Fifty” in the US. These were companies which wer...
-
As part of my monitoring process, I follow the dividend increases for companies I own, and companies on my watchlist. This process can also...
-
As part of my monitoring process, I review the list of dividend increases every week. This exercise helps me monitor the progress of existi...
-
Peter Lynch is a super-investor, who managed to compound money at 29.30% at Fidelity Magellan Fund between 1977 and 1990. He is a very smart...
-
I review the list of dividend increases as part of my monitoring process. I find it helpful to observe the companies I own execute on their...
-
I review the list of dividend increases as part of my monitoring process. This helps me review the story behind companies I already own. It ...
-
We have had some new readers join the Dividend Growth Investor website. As a result, I wanted to discuss briefly what Dividend Growth Invest...
-
As an investor, I follow a very simple model. I look for companies that have a track record of annual dividend increases, supported by earn...
-
"The idea that a bell rings to signal when investors should get into or out of the market is simply not credible. After nearly 50 years...
-
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) operates as an options exchange in the United States. It operates in five segments: Options, U.S. Equities,...
The Obama administration insists it doesn't plan to nationalize U.S. banks, but this is a "rose by any other name" situation."The degree of U.S. government interference in the private sector banking industry is a recipe for disaster, and is completely contrary to the 'capitalism concept' that served America well for many decades."
ReplyDeleteSource