Financial independence is the point at which your annual dividend income meets or exceeds your annual expenditures. At this point, the dividend investor does not need to have a job, although they could decide to keep doing their work if they enjoy it. The best part is that the investor does not need to work for money again in their life, and can choose to spend their time as they please. They could do volunteer work, take care of younger or elder family members, travel, read or write, or even watch soap operas all the time. If they enjoy their work, they could continue doing that, or they might decide to start their own independent business. The sky is the limit when you have taken care of the downside, by having a dividend portfolio generate an ever rising amount of cash every year, which covers your expenses.
I believe that a dividend portfolio will generate rising income for decades, and solid capital gains in the process of 30 years or more. Even at a total return of 7%/year, $1 million today will grow to $8 million over that time period. That of course assume that dividends are spent, and very little is reinvested back. Some companies will be sold, acquired, merged or fail, but in general this will be a very passive portfolio. I am pretty optimistic about my portfolio after I reach financial independence and believe I will ultimately end up earning much more in dividends than what I would ever earn from paid employment. Once I select a quality dividend paying company, my only downside is the price I paid for the stock. My upside is the sum of all future dividends I will receive until the end of time. The rest is unrealized capital gains, which would result in a step-up basis for whoever inherits the DGI nest egg. However, I am also operating under the belief that the upside will take care of itself. Therefore, I need to spend my time to protect my downside risks. As a result, I believe in generating redundancies in my portfolio, in order to ensure that I stay financially independent. This is where the concept of margin of safety in Financial Independence comes from.
I took the idea of redundancies from the concept of engineering, where bridges are constructed, so that they can carry several times their projected peak load. They have built in overlaps and redundancies just in case peak loads increase over time, and also to withstand a long period of normal wear and tear.
For my portfolio, I want to ensure I it withstands as much pressure without breaking. Thus, i expect to have multiple layers of redundancies built into my portfolio.
- I buy stocks that have many products/services with revenues derived from many continents/countries. This diversity in revenue streams ensures that company is not overly reliant on a single product for which demand softens.
- I buy stocks from different industries, and I try to be diversified so that a total collapse of one of these companies doesn't derail my plans. I seek safety in numbers and believe that a portfolio should include at least 30 – 40 individual components for diversification purposes.
- I focus on companies that regularly hike dividends, and have an established track record of doing so. This provides an extra layer protection that my dividend income will keep up with inflation over time.
- I make sure dividend payments are adequately covered for any new companies I buy, so that short term fluctuations in earnings per share do not leave dividends in danger. In addition, I make sure that dividend growth is not largely achieved by the expansion in the payout ratio.
- I also plan to retire when dividend income covers expenses by a nice margin of up to 1.30- 1.50 times expenses. I am placing the money that generates the excess dividends in tax-deferred accounts, so that they grow uninterrupted if I never use them. In addition, putting money in tax-deferred accounts further diversifies my asset base, and would shelter this portion of networth from taxes for several decades from now.
- I hold my stocks through several brokerages, in order to make sure I would always be under the SIPC covered amounts, and protect myself in case of broker failures
On a personal note, I also try to keep 3 – 6 months of expenses in my checking account. I do these funds just in case, even though I do not really need an emergency fund. I do not need an emergency fund, because I am disciplined about my spending. In addition, my dividend portfolio is an emergency fund of itself, since it would throw off enough cash to support me for 12 months. Currently, this figure is close to 7 months worth of expenses being covered by dividend income. Plus, I view my dividend portfolio as an emergency fund that has enough resources to pay for somewhere around 240 months’ worth of expenses.
In addition to that, I also have a line of credit equivalent to 2 years expenses I can draw on, in case my cash reserves are depleted. I honestly doubt that I would ever use the cash or line of credit for emergency purposes, but then you never know what the future holds for.
Next, I also expect that I will be able to collect some Social Security benefits in the future, when I become eligible for them. I strongly doubt that Social Security will ever be destroyed, although I wouldn’t be surprised if it gets modified in the future. I view Social Security income as similar to an investment in an inflation-protected annuity or inflation protected treasury bond.
The one weak spot in my retirement planning is the absolutely low amount of fixed income allocation I have. In order to withstand the next Great Depression or Japan of the past 20 years, I would need to have exposure to domestic government bonds. If we get deflation, this would jeopardize corporate profits and the ability to maintain dividend payments for a lot of companies. My allocation to fixed income is currently less than 1% today. I do not believe that the current environment offers good prospects for buyers of US Treasuries, which is why I have abstained from investing there. I simply do not want to invest my money in an asset whose principal and income are certain to lose purchasing power over time. However, I am monitoring the situation, and would gladly change my mind if attractive offers are present.
- Dividend Investing Is Not As Risky As It Is Portrayed
- Dividends Offer an Instant Rebate on Your Purchase Price
- How to define risk in dividend paying stocks?
- Stress Testing Your Dividend Portfolio
- Where are the original Dividend Aristocrats now?
The S&P Dividend Aristocrats index is an elite group of companies, members of the S&P 500, which have managed to increase dividends ...
I just received notification that low cost broker Loyal3 is shutting down, effective May 22 2017. Loyal3 was a decent commission free alte...
In a previous article I discussed that I am on track to have my dividend income cover my expenses sometime around 2018 . I received a few qu...
As part of my monitoring process, I review the list of dividend increases every week. I usually focus my attention to companies that have r...
Last week, I shared the 2017 list of dividend aristocrats . The most common question I received focused on which companies are attractively ...
I look at the list of dividend increases every week, as part of my monitoring process. I then narrow the scope by focusing on companies tha...
This guest post has been written by Mike McNeil, passionate investor, founder of Dividend Stocks Rock and author of The Dividend Guy Blo...
Successful dividend growth investing relies on finding companies at an attractive price which can grow earnings and dividends over time. A...
People usually get emotional when the topic of rent versus buy is brought up. One group swears by owning a home, and believes that it is a g...
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) provides branded consumer packaged goods to consumers in North America, Europe, the Asia Pacific, Ind...