Wednesday, November 20, 2013

International Dividend Stocks – Pros and Cons

Investors are always told to diversify. Diversification is the tool to protect investors from the unknown risks at the time of purchase. In my dividend portfolio, I always try to be diversified, meaning that I hold at least 30 - 40  individual securities representative of as many sectors that make sense. For some reason however, my portfolio only has a few companies traded internationally, which account for about 9% of its value.

International exposure is helpful, because different economies run on different market cycles. For example, if the economy in the US is stagnating, Asian countries might benefit from rise in economic output. In addition, some countries might benefit from increase in number of middle class consumers, which could bode well for earnings and stock prices and dividends.

By limiting themselves to only US companies, US investors might miss on international success stories that could benefit returns. With the increase in globalization, it is possible for a company to start small in one country, but then expand internationally. This could lead to increased profits, and hopefully dividends and stock prices. By increasing the pool of companies to look at, investors increase their chances of finding the next dividend gem for their portfolios.

Another positive fact of international dividend investing is diversifying away from the US dollar. By purchasing foreign assets, US investors will be receiving dividends denominated in Swiss francs, UK pounds, Canadian Dollars and others. This could be viewed as a positive by investors who believe that the US dollar will gradually lose purchasing power relative to these currencies over the long term.

While there are certain advantages to holding international dividend stocks, there are also a few disadvantages.

The first disadvantage includes that foreign stocks pay irregular dividends. Most pay distributions only once per year. Others pay dividends twice per year, by paying an interim and a final dividend. Often the interim dividend is 30%-40% of the total annual distribution, with the final dividend accounting for 60% - 70% of the annual distribution. British based telecom giant Vodafone Group (VOD) is a prime example of this. For 2013, the company paid an interim dividend of 3.27 pence/share, while for the final dividend the company paid 6.92 pence/share, or a total of 10.19 pence/share. This is why calculating the dividend yield could be tricky on a company like Vodafone, especially given that the new interim dividend has recently been increased to 3.53 pence/share.

Other companies like global food giant Nestle (NSRGY) pay dividends once per year, and withhold 15% for US residents. Check my analysis of Nestle.

Another disadvantage of foreign dividend stocks is the fact that few international companies follow a managed dividend policy like US companies. Most US corporations pay a stable and rising dividend, and avoid cutting distributions at all costs. Most foreign companies tend to pay a fluctuating dividend, which could vary greatly from year to year. This variability is caused by the fact that most foreign companies tend to target a certain dividend payout ratio. Since earnings per share fluctuate, so do dividend payments to shareholders of these non-US based companies. Investors also need to be careful in following dividend trends in the local currency, rather than the US dollar converted amounts. For example, for Unliever, it seems like distributions are declared in Euros, and then translated into pounds for PLC holders and dollars for ADR's traded on US markets. Therefore, anyone who followed the dividend trends in pounds or dollars, would be focusing on noise. Focus on the dividend trends in Euro's for Unilever.

Another disadvantage of owning foreign dividend stocks includes steep withholding taxes on distributions. These are typically withheld at source and could vary country by country. These taxes on dividend incomes charged to US investors could vary from 15% to as much as 25%. Investors can usually deduct taxes withheld fully if they are within 15%, using IRS form 1116. US investors who receive foreign dividends in retirement accounts however are still taxed on distributions receive, and cannot get them back. UK is one of the few countries which does not withhold taxes on dividend income paid to US investors. There are several companies which are headquartered in the UK and in another country such as the Netherlands or Australia. As a result, whenever you have a choice between the UK and the other country shares, always select the UK listed one.

Unilever is a prime example of this situation. There are two ADRs trading on NYSE. The Netherland based Unilever N.V. trades under ticker (UN). The UK based Unilever PLC trades under ticker (UL). Investors in both stocks get exactly the same dividends. The only difference is that investors in Unilever NV (UN) are subject to a 15% withholding tax, whereas investors in Unilever PLC (UL) are not. US investors still need to pay taxes on international dividends received however, if paid in taxable accounts.

In addition, some countries do not levy withholding taxes on dividends that are received in retirement accounts, such as Roth IRA's for example. The prime example includes Canada, which usually withholds 15% from dividends paid to US residents at source. However, if you placed those securities in retirement account, Canada would not tax these dividends.

Investors in international equities also need to be aware of the fact that these companies are likely not following US GAAP accounting rules. The whole world seems to have adopted IFRS, albeit it doesn’t seem to have a very consistent implementation. It seems as if each country has managed to implement its own version of IFRS. In addition, investors purchasing foreign shares on international exchanges might find it difficult to open brokerage accounts, wire funds in and out and need to be aware of taxation of dividends and capital gains. For example, Chinese markets are mostly closed to US investors. This means that you cannot go and purchase any Chinese stock that you wish. Other countries have currency controls in place, and might limit the amount of funds you can convert back to US dollars.

In conclusion, while there might be some benefit to receiving international dividends, there are also a lot of cons that investors need to be aware of. In general, I try to purchase US multinationals with long histories of dividend increases, which also have global operations. I have found that a large portion of US dividend companies revenues are derived from international operations, in some cases more than 50%. As a result, I do not have to deal with currency volatility, foreign withholding tax rates, setting up brokerage accounts in 20 different countries and international accounting rules.


For example, when I looked at the ten largest components of the S&P 500 index, I found out that they generate approximately 50% of their revenues from outside the US in 2012. This is significant, and it should probably make you think twice before using measures such as comparing current market capitalization to US GDP to past values of this indicator, as a tool that has any relevant predictive value.

Full Disclosure: Long UL, VOD, NSRGY, XOM, JNJ, CVX, PG, WFC

Relevant Articles:

Check the Complete Article Archive
International Over Diversification
Four International Dividend Stocks to Consider
Best International Dividend Stocks
International Dividend Achievers for diversification


10 comments:

  1. Do you know if the 15% withholding on Nestle (NSRGY) can be recouped if held in a retirement account? I currently have it in my Roth which may not be the best idea.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "In addition, some countries do not levy withholding taxes on dividends that are received in retirement accounts, such as Roth IRA's for example. The prime example includes Canada, which usually withholds 15% from dividends paid to US residents at source. However, if you placed those securities in retirement account, Canada would tax these dividends."

    I think there is a typo on the second sentence i.e. the word "not is missing. It should read "Canada would not tax these dividends".

    This is so because of the Canada-US Tax Treaty.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good write up on tax implications of foreign dividends.

    The ability to take the foreign tax credit is the main reason I hold foreign equities in a taxable account.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Could you clarify the tax withholding regarding Canada again? Do they withhold the tax for retirement accounts or non-retirement accounts?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kyle & Richard,

    You are correct, Canada should not be witholding taxes on Canadian Dividends paid in retirement accounts of US residents. I fixed the typo

    BidAsk,

    I don't think so, but you might want to check to confirm. I own NSRGY in taxable account

    ReplyDelete
  6. So really, this leaves only a certain countries that you can invest in reasonably. Canada (tax free if you have a retirement account.UK (tax free), Japan (10% tax, which isn't terrible... I have a telecom company from Japan and the tax rate didn't seem outrageous.

    read this for further info:

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/248039-withholding-tax-rates-by-country-for-foreign-stock-dividends

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Kyle,

    Even if other countries withhold 15% on your dividends, you are getting a full credit from the IRS on that ( in taxable accounts). Now, if the foreign withholding was above 15%, then you might be out some cash.

    Switzerland witholds 15%, because there is an agreemebt between US and Switzerland. It was never an issue with Zecco, but this year Tradeking made a mistake and withheld 35%, so I had to discuss the issue with them, until they "only" took 15%.

    I am not sure also how Australia withholds dividends, as there is a system of franked and unfranked dividends, where only a portion of distributions are subject to a wihtholding tax.

    As for the link, I am not sure how accurate these rates are, given that they are from 2011 - tax laws can change frequently.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What about he ADR pass-thru fee--assessed by the Transfer Agent?? It's not a tax, but a hidden fee, so maybe that's why everyone ignores it.
    Your annual divi on EVERY foreign ADR security is reduced by .02 per share held! And if there isn't a dividend your account (taxable or not) will be charged anyway.
    Unlike a foreign tax it can't be claimed as a credit on your income tax.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bobcoz,

    The fee is negligible, but even at 1 - 3 cents/year/share, can result in some reductions in dividend income.

    However, if your dividend is $2/share and you are charged a fee of 2 cents/share, your taxable income is $1.98/share. This means you should pay taxes on $1.98 not $2.

    On the other hand, you can bypass ADR fees, if you go ahead and invest abroad directly. This means open a brokerage account in Switzerland, one in UK, one in Canada etc. Or you can use services of US brokers like Etrade or Schwab, which let you buy international securities directly on foreign markets. If this direct foreign investment results in investment costs to you that exceed 2-3 cents/share, then you might be better off with ADR's. I am not sure what the costs of owning foreign shares either in a foreign broker account or a Us one like Schwab are.

    The way I view it is that I would try to avoid being penny wise and dollar foolish, meaning that if i find a good investment abroad, I buy it. If it results in a 2 cent annual fee, I can live with it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I love the idea about picking up Multinationals to avoid the negatives associated with foreign dividends. Although it stands to reason that every company has some sort of foreign exposure

    ReplyDelete

Questions or comments? You can reach out to me at my website address name at gmail dot com.

Popular Posts