Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Which candidate is better for dividend investors – Obama or McCain?

This blog rarely discusses political issues, as my goal for writing posts is to mainly educate people on investing, without trying to influence them how to spend their money or live their lives. I recently stumbled a NY Times article, which summarized the candidates’ views on dividend taxation. Most of you might remember that prior to the 2003 tax law change, which made qualified dividends taxable at the top rate of 15%, dividend income was taxed at the top marginal rate for ordinary income. The current preferential treatment of dividends is set to expire at the end of 2010. The article from Gregory Mankiw summarizes both candidates’ opinions on the subject of future taxation of dividends:

“But for dividend income, Senator Obama has proposed only a modest increase in the top tax rate, to 20 percent from 15 percent. That is, the personal income tax would continue to tax dividends at a far lower rate than ordinary income. This decision must surprise many of his Congressional supporters. But it should be making President Bush smile.


In light of Senator Obama’s stand, the politics of dividend taxation may take some surprising twists. Senator John McCain wants to maintain the current tax rate of 15 percent on dividends (while cutting the corporate tax), but it is a good bet that if Senator McCain is elected president, while Congress remains Democratic, Congress won’t give the Republican president what he wants. They would instead let the Bush tax cuts expire, returning the dividend tax for high-income taxpayers to about 40 percent.

This leads to one of the great ironies of the political season. On the issue of dividend taxation, Barack Obama may be the candidate with the best chance of preserving George Bush’s legacy."

Another positive fact if Democrats win is that the Stock Market has historically performed well under their reign according to this article from Jeremy Siegel.



To summarize it seems that the best candidate for the president post would be Obama, if you look into it from a dividend stock investor’s perspective.


Full Disclosure: I am long SPY

4 comments:

  1. Dear Blogger,

    Very interesting article comparing the market returns over each President's term. It made for some very interested reading and discussion.

    I work for Wikinvest.com, an investing wiki with research about companies like those you blog about and concepts like oil prices and the credit crunch. I've been approaching top bloggers identified by our business development team about the Wikinvest Wire, a traffic-boosting, invitation-only blogwire for investing and finance blogs.

    If you're interested, do get back to me at vikram [at] wikinvest [dot] com for more details.

    Have a great week ahead!

    Vikram

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi!
    Are you interested in getting a template/ banner/ header/ logo/ business cards/ mascot designs for your site for no money, in return we require text links from your site http://dividendgrowth.blogspot.com. Approaching you through this form since there was no email address. Please get back to me if you are interested.

    Name: Joe Nathan
    Email: joenathanls@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. I never thought about it like that. It will be a sad day when we lose our 15% rate though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Vikram and Joe,

    Please check your e-mails.

    Jake,

    Even if the rate on dividends were to increase back to the top ordinary income tax rate, it would be still better than employment income. I do hope however that politicians make dividend income more efficient given the need for income among the growing population of new retireees.( who are hungry for income)

    ReplyDelete

Questions or comments? You can reach out to me at my website address name at gmail dot com.

Popular Posts